An important lesson from the fall of Tiger Woods

general 12 Comments
Image provided by Keith Allison via Wikipedia

(Image provided by Keith Allison via Wikipedia)

Tiger Woods’ recent fall from grace is a shame, not only for those directly involved, but for the entire sport of golf.

It also highlights a wide range of broader issues and questions relating to personal, professional and business ethics.

Amongst other things, these could include:

 
• How the private conduct of high profile professionals can affect their ‘brand value’ in terms of advertising and corporate sponsorship.

The understatement made by consulting firm Accenture upon termination of its sponsorship – about Woods being “no longer being the right representative,” – said it all.

So too does the more frank commentary (same article) of public relations consultant Ian Monk, about Woods being “… damaged goods with no commercial value to sponsors whatsover.”

 
• How the expectations placed upon role models in any profession extend beyond their professional lives.

Role models, it seems, are expected to demonstrate exemplary behavior in all aspects of their life – private or professional.

 
• The issue of media outlets paying for stories.

I don’t know whether or not Jaimee Grubs or any of the other women involved have indeed received any form of payment from media outlets for going public on this story. But I certainly hope they didn’t.

Woods’ transgressions are unacceptable, but so too are those of any of the women involved. Each of them appears to have been willing participants in their affair with the superstar – none deserve any financial reward for their behavior

 
Even the best are mortal
But there is one important lesson which should not be forgotten in any of this – the fallibility of even the most revered superstars.

Prior to the revelations, there were strong reasons for holding Woods in high regard, particularly given the way his work ethic, general demeanor and extensive involvement with charities and youth projects served to complement his talent and achievements. He was, it seemed, an ideal role model.

Nor was it in any way wrong to give him so much respect. Positive role models are needed in every profession, and those who achieve excellence whilst appearing to conduct themselves in an exemplary manner deserve our admiration.

But these sentiments must be tempered with two sobering realities:

• we don’t always know the whole story; and
• even the best role models are human.

The second point is especially pertinent. No matter how exemplary their behavior may be, all role models are human. None of them are infallible, nor should we expect them to be. Disappointment is inevitable if we forget this.

Respect for high achievers who display exemplary behavior is healthy, but idolization is not. No one should be put on a pedestal.

 
Great shame, important lesson
Tiger’s fall from grace was a great pity. I certainly hope that he is able to get his life back together and, if possible, salvage his marriage.

In the meantime, his story serves as an important reminder about the fallibility of even the most revered superstars.

Those who set positive examples deserve our full respect – but they should never become our idols.

a

12 Responses to “An important lesson from the fall of Tiger Woods”

  1. Brad Shorr Says:
    January 11th, 2010 at 12:04 am

    Hi Andrew, Your conclusion about not putting athletes on a pedestal is incredibly rational and reasonable. Sadly, we are far, far away from that ideal, and the market proves it. College football coaches are signing $35 million dollar deals. In Major League baseball, the average annual player’s salary is $12 million. But what’s even more concerning, here in the U.S. anyway, we’re moving from not caring about player conduct to accepting bad conduct. The way things are going, if the Tiger Woods situation had occurred in 2015, he’d probably attract more sponsors and be idolized even more. It’s a strange world we live in.

  2. Andrew Says:
    January 11th, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    Hi Brad,

    $12 million average salary in Major League? Wow – that’s huge!

    I guess that’s the profession to be in for anyone who wants to strike it rich – provided of course that they have the skill and determination to make it to the elite level.

    More seriously though, any move toward acceptance of poor conduct does represent a real problem, particularly given the way in which role models influence attitudes and behavior at a broader level of society – especially among children.

    Of course, we are all human and no one should be expected to be perfect. Those at the elite level must be given a reasonable degree of allowance for any human errors which they make.

    Just the same, however, professional athletes should be expected to make reasonable efforts to set a positive example.

  3. Fred H Schlegel Says:
    January 12th, 2010 at 5:44 am

    I have a feeling that ratings for golf where Tiger Woods appears will remain high. The current controversy doesn’t really effect his ability to dominate the sport. However, the fact that sponsors are dropping him for the time being (they will be back assuming he performs whatever penance the ‘public’ demands) is a rational step. When a company hires a spokesperson they are relying on that individuals reputation both in their profession as well as their character. This can go both ways. ‘Bad boys’ get sponsors – just not family brand names.

    I don’t really see this as unfair. He didn’t break the rules of golf, so he can still play golf. He did break the rules of sponsorship deals with family oriented brands and so they are gone. He’s human. But even if he wasn’t famous there would be repercussions for his alleged behavior.

  4. Mark Says:
    January 12th, 2010 at 11:25 am

    We each are on a journey, a custom journey at that. Tiger has taught us many lessons, both through what we would consider a good example and now what we would consider a bad example. None of us are in a position to throw stones, we must instead observe and learn. Good post Andrew.

  5. Andrew Says:
    January 13th, 2010 at 8:04 am

    Fred,

    Yep, I’m pretty sure those sponsors will be back alright – although they may choose to wait until Woods returns from his recently announced break from the game.

    A few years ago down here in Australia, we had a much publicized case whereby cricketing legend and national hero Shane Warne was dumped from the Channel Nine commentary team following allegations of extra-marital affairs and a subsequent separation from his wife. Five years or so later, Warne has been fully reinstated as a member of the commentary team and he is back at Nine in full swing.

    Corporate sponsors/employers, it seems, do not stay away forever.

  6. Andrew Says:
    January 13th, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    Mark,

    Exactly right – it’s all too easy to sit back and criticize, but we are all fallible and none of us are in any position to judge others, even if we don’t approve of their behavior.

    To exercise discernment with regard to the behavior of others and to learn lessons (positive and negative) is a wise move. To cast judgment on others for their mistakes is not.

  7. Karen Swim Says:
    January 14th, 2010 at 11:55 pm

    Andrew, I wholeheartedly agree with your points. Tiger Woods and all those involved are culpable. However, it is a sobering reminder that we should idolize no man or woman. Woods’ behavior was not new, he was known as a “party boy” pre-marriage and his wife was aware of it. I do not condone promiscuity at all but I wonder if we (the public, sponsors) are hypocritical in our expectations of high profile people. Tiger Woods is an exceptionally gifted golfer with a tremendous work ethic about his sport. He also has done much through his charitable giving. His moral failings don’t change that. I still respect his golf game and work ethic but do not idolize his humanity.

  8. Andrew Says:
    January 15th, 2010 at 7:17 am

    Karen,

    Your last sentence here reflects a common-sense viewpoint about Tiger. He has his faults and he has let his family down, but he is still every bit a tremendous golfer with a fantastic work ethic. That much about him still commands respect from where I stand.

  9. thomas Says:
    January 15th, 2010 at 8:02 am

    Once you are up in the spotlight, anyone and everyone has reason to want to bring you down. People are jealous and greedy.

    People in fame have worked hard to get there but once they grab major attention they are pretty much used like tools for the companies to profit off and once they are not needed, they are thrown away.

  10. drew Says:
    January 16th, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    Tom,

    Certainly true – ‘tall poppy syndrome’ is alive and well.

  11. Ana Says:
    January 31st, 2010 at 11:28 am

    Let me begin by saying that I am no Tiger Woods fan and never have been. The guy hits tiny balls into tiny holes in the ground (let’s be honest, isn’t that what golf is?!) I disagree that people in fame have worked hard to get there. Maybe some do, but many don’t. In the United States, you can be famous for the dumbest things. You can be famous for singing badly on American Idol (take your pick), or divorcing your husband on a bad reality tv show (Kate Gosselin), or inheriting money you didn’t work for (Paris Hilton), or asking a presidential candidate a question (Joe the Plumber.) It’s ridiculous.

    Tiger Woods will be allowed back into golf and our pop culture because he makes money and people in this country have short-term memories. Pretty soon, he’ll be on Oprah and 60 Minutes and he’ll be the “comeback kid.” Do Americans still remember what Michael Vick did (convicted dog fighter who killed multiple dogs on his own estate?) Hardly. Now he’s a winner because he played okay for the Philadelphia Eagles. Remember Kobe Bryant from the LA Lakers? Remember the adultery and the rape charges (of which he was acquitted?) Probably not, because he’s a winner with the Lakers.

    I also think that men are held to a lower standard than women. In my opinion, men sleeping around and cheating on their spouses (even with more women than you can count) are more likely to be forgiven for simply “being men” while women who sleep around on their spouses are more likely to be condemned as “whores.” But I suppose that’s my gender bias.

  12. drew Says:
    February 2nd, 2010 at 7:50 am

    Ana,

    Actually, on your last point, you may well be right. Acts of sleeping around by men are all too often brushed off as being “part of what mother nature intended,” whereas women who participate in similar behavior are shamed.

    That is wrong. Sleeping around is equally poor behavior regardless of whether one happens to be male or female.

    Also, I share some of your feelings about Michael Voss. Maybe he should be forgiven, but he is not a hero and should not be treated like one.

    But I cannot agree with your views about golf as a profession. Golf is an extremely challenging (and mostly, enjoyable) sport. To have the degree of control required to propel such a small object in the right direction at the right speed on such a consistent basis like all of the professional golfers do requires not only an amazing amount of skill and talent but also years of dedication, practice and hard work. Personally, I may have lost some respect for Tiger as a person, but I have enormous respect for his professional golfing ability.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled
Icons by N.Design Studio. Designed By Ben Swift. Powered by WordPress and Free WordPress Themes
Entries RSS