Do borrowers share responsibility for the financial crisis?

general 5 Comments

The lack of ethical behavior on behalf of financial institutions for their role in the current financial crisis in the U.S. is well documented.

The finance industry neglected its duty of care in two key areas – advancement of credit beyond levels which borrowers could afford, and failure to manage their loan portfolios with sufficient prudence so as to ensure their long term survival.

Their neglect of this duty has widespread consequences, particularly for borrowers, taxpayers and the economy as a whole.

But do borrowers have to share some of the responsibility? Yes and no.

 

The responsibility of borrowers
Some commentators, such as business ethics motivational speaker Chuck Gallagher, feel that borrowers need not accept responsibility for the current situation.

To a degree, this viewpoint is fair enough. Borrowers, after all, did not cause the collapse of financial institutions – this was caused by internal mismanagement of loan portfolios by the institutions themselves.

Nevertheless, what borrowers are responsible for is their own debt commitments. Borrowers, in my view, owe a duty of care not to borrow in excess of their debt servicing capacity.

Prior to taking out a loan, borrowers have a responsibility to make a realistic assessment of whether their debt servicing capacity is likely to be sufficient to meet their loan commitments, and also to ensure that they fully understand the terms and conditions of the loan. Most importantly, borrowers have a duty to refrain from accepting any offer of credit which exceeds their anticipated debt servicing capacity.

Any borrowers who do not possess sufficient expertise to do this for themselves should seek independent financial counsel prior to the acceptance of any loan.

To be sure, many borrowers may have been bombarded with aggressive marketing campaigns from lenders. As human beings, they are susceptible to such campaigns. This, however, does not absolve borrowers of responsibility for their own decisions.

Of course, some borrowers experience difficulty through no fault of their own. Unexpected circumstances, such as job losses or personal injury can easily cause even diligent borrowers to default on loan commitments.

I am not referring to such cases here. Instead, I am referring to cases where borrowers over-borrow in the first place.

 

In a nutshell
Borrowers did not cause the financial crisis – irresponsible lending practices and poor loan portfolio management did that.

But each and every individual borrower is responsible for ensuring that they do not accept credit levels beyond their anticipated debt servicing capacity.

 

5 Responses to “Do borrowers share responsibility for the financial crisis?”

  1. Brad Shorr Says:
    October 14th, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Hi Andrew, The circumstances of these junk loans vary quite a bit, I think. Some borrowers clearly went into these deals with their eyes wide open, others did not. But another factor was that everyone else was doing it. In some areas of the U.S., like California, crazy real estate deals became the norm.

    Brad Shorrs last blog post..Do You Have a Pet Phrase?

  2. Andrew Says:
    October 15th, 2008 at 6:37 am

    Brad,

    Isn’t it funny how the ‘herd’ mentality can influence decision making, even when people are faced with decisions which can have an impact on their families for decades?

    Andrews last blog post..Socially Responsible Investing part 9: Does ethical investing compromise investment performance?

  3. Tina McAllister Says:
    October 16th, 2008 at 1:04 am

    I have to agree with your post, Andrew. I worked in real estate for years and had clients who wanted to buy the more expensive house just because they “qualified” for it with the lender. But I would point out their actual monthly income and expenses to show that, no, they couldn’t afford the home. I refused to help clients who insisted on spending more than they could truly afford.

    I also know first-hand people in CA who gambled on neg-am loans and are now complaining about the evil lenders who put them in this horrible financial situation. Uh, you gambled and you lost. Sorry..but that’s what gambling is all about – risk!
    Great post!

    Tina McAllisters last blog post..The Curse of Perfectionism

  4. Andrew Says:
    October 17th, 2008 at 6:11 am

    Hi Tim,

    Welcome to Good Honest Dollar and thank you for your comment.

    Congratulations upon your refusal to work with clients on a basis which would not have been viable for them. I wish more real estate professionals would follow this practice.

  5. Andrew Says:
    October 17th, 2008 at 6:42 am

    Tina,

    Please accept my apologies for the misstatement of your name above.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled
Icons by N.Design Studio. Designed By Ben Swift. Powered by WordPress and Free WordPress Themes
Entries RSS